Showing posts with label Marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marketing. Show all posts

Saturday, May 29, 2010

triOS College & 241 Pizza - the Strategic Partnership?

Generally speaking, a strategic partnership links two or more brands together to form a mutually beneficial campaign. We've seen many of these over time and they can add great value to both marketers and consumers.

Then there's this one: triOS college, a Private Career College with 8 campuses in Ontario has recently teamed up with 241 Pizza to offer a free $500 bursary to any of their 20 programs just by picking up a 241 Pizza flyer (which is also being sent to over 3,000,000 homes in Ontario via direct mail).

You don't have to order any pizza to "win" - triOS is effectively offering a $500 off coupoon through a 241 direct mail piece. I learned about this promotion by watching a quick spot on Omni TV where annoying host Lucy Zilio told me to visit trios.com/241 . The link, by the way, has nothing to do with the promotion.

To summarize:
  • triOS, which appeals to only a portion of education seekers is offering anyone $500 off tuition on one of their programs in "partnership" with 241 Pizza
  • Neither party seems to be promoting this campaign on their websites outside of a generic link at 241's site to their "new flyer"
  • You don't have to enter to win, buy pizza, etc. so it seems there's nothing in it for 241
This is less of a strategic partnership and more of triOS trying to embellish an ad buy on 241's flyer.

I'd love to know what redemption rates are on this poorly panned and horribly executed campaign... I'm just glad triOS doesn't offer a diploma in Marketing.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Too little too late?

There's something to be said about the timeliness of an ad campaign. In this month's Maxim Magazine, I noticed this ad for the "New Schick Hydro 3", which promises to be "a better shave than the Mach 3".

This makes me wonder...

- Why would Schick introduce a new 3-blade razor when the competition has been pushing their 5-blade Fusion series for well over a year?

- Why would they compare it to a competitive product that has more or less become obsolete?

I have to admit, I still shave with a Mach 3 blade. It meets my needs and I have never felt the urge to upgrade to a Fusion series.

That said, I really can't see why I would make a 'lateral' shift from a Mach 3 to a Hydro 3 when the next logical purchase would be the more advanced 5-blade razor.

Sooner or later, both Schick and Gillette will stop offering replacement blades in an effort to upgrade those of us stubborn 3-bladers. It is beyond me why Schick would invest into a market that is beyond mature.

I would love to see some market-share numbers on this category or get some insight from anyone who has some industry knowledge.

Still, I believe this product and campaign are too little too late...

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Is Ronald on death row?

It's been a while since my last post... partly due to being busy and partly because I really don't think that there's been anything exciting to write about these last several weeks.

This morning something caught my eye that is very blog-worthy. Boston-based Corporate Accountability International, the lobby group that shut down "Joe Camel" back in the late 90s is at it again and this time, their target is the ubiquitous Ronald McDonald.

CAI believes that Ronald, as an attractive mascot for kids, has helped carve the McDonald's message into their young minds, contributing to the overwhelming childhood obesity, diabetes, etc. seen in kids today.

An initial survey showed that while the majority - 65% - said they had favourable impressions of Ronald (largely in part to the charity work that McDonald's does), 46% did agree that it was time to retire the 47 year old spokes-clown.

While CAI still has a long way to go on this battle, some analysts believe that it might make sense for McDonald's to concede since kid's meals are not the biggest share of their revenue and the corporation is still focused on growth in overseas markets.

CAI has won some important victories over the last 30+ years... I'm curious to see how this one pans out.

Friday, February 5, 2010

LCBO's "Gay" radio ad

The LCBO has recently launched a radio ad in which a man comes home and calls out: "Honey? Babe? Mark?". Mark then replies and the two men have a comedic exchange about building a rooftop bar.

While not overtly "gay", I think it's a bold and fantastic move for the LCBO to produce an ad that includes "alternative lifestyles".

This isn't exactly the first ad of its kind, however I don't think any other government-run operation has ever made a move of this kind.

The ad is cute/funny without being offensive or politically charged... much unlike the Mr. Sub ad that I wrote about a while back, the inclusion of gay men in the ad is perfectly natural and reads the way it would had it been a male/female couple.

Good for the LCBO for recognizing all lifestyles equally and for putting out this ad. I wish that I had a link to share, but despite scouring Google, I haven't been able to find one... so keep your ears open!

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Technology and Cause Marketing

Short text codes are pretty common these days where marketers invite you to text a message to a short number in exchange for offers, updates, etc.

While many of us are reluctant to invite marketers to reachus on our mobile phones, the short code does make certain things quick, easy and impulsive.

In wake of the Haitian crisis, the American Red Cross initiated an emergency relief campaign in which people were asked to donate $10 to Red Cross International Relief simply by texting "Haiti" to the short code 90999.

As of Friday, January 15, approximately 520,000 Americans had used the text campaign to donate $5.2 million for Haitian relief efforts with more coming in!

I can't help but believe that a good chunk of this success is the direct result of the simplicity of the donation process and fully commend the American Red Cross for this great campaign.

Let's keep those donations coming - those $10 add up really quick when we all work together towards the goal of helping those in need.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Listening to the customer... a great practice!

I've never liked Domino's pizza. It tastes completely manufactured with nothing fresh or real-tasting about it. Apparently I'm not alone.

Domino's recently launched a new ad campaign and website called PizzaTurnaround.com. The whole premise is that they asked consumers to provide candid feedback on their pizza and that the results weren't good.

Committed to change, Domino's has apparently changed their recipes to offer customers a better, fresher tasting pizza that addresses their concerns - and they want everyone to know it.

The entire campaign basically focuses on one key message: You spoke. We listened. Give us a try.

This campaign is enough for me to want to give Domino's a second chance, if for no other reason to see if there's been any improvement. I'm pretty certain that many people will do the same out of curiosity.

Kudos to Domino's for engaging their consumers and adapting their product to be more desirable. Too often do marketers try to convince consumers that their product is great rather than accepting criticism.

I think that this move will help Domino's regain some lost share and even pick up some new customers along the way.

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

How to spoil a great branding effort














I like the Telus brand. I also like the cute animals they use to push their "Future is Friendly" messaging.

As a frequent movie-goer, I also love that Telus has partnered up with Cineplex to bring us Telus Tuesdays, where guests receive admission, regular popcorn and regular drink for about half price.

To help promote the Telus brand in association with this great offer, a microsite was launched with all of the info including a cast of characters and branded popcorn bags. At first glance, I was pretty impressed with this campaign, both from a consumer's perspective and in terms of the strategic partnership created between Telus and Cineplex...

...then I grabbed my seat inside the theatre.

Before your movie starts, Cineplex typically shows 5 or 6 ads (before the trailers) and I've noticed that they often coincide with the expected demographic for the film about to be screened. This is a great revenue stream for Cineplex and a great way for advertisers to reach a captive audience within their demographic.

As I sat there watching the screen, anxious for my film to start I saw ads for WIND Mobile, Rogers Wireless AND Bell Mobility!

I have no idea what Telus is spending in order to present the Telus Tuesday combo, but someone really dropped the ball when not one, but THREE major competitors all had ads displayed in the theatre prior to the start of the film.

Sure, Telus had the last ad before the trailers hit the screen, but it blows my mind that they didn't arrange some sort of exclusivity agreement to prohibit competitor's ads from being shown on Tuesday nights.

One sure-fire way to spoil a great branding campaign is to fail to protect your efforts from the competition. I congratulate Telus for a fantastic promotion but they lose points for overlooking some pretty important details.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

10 Worst Ads of 2009

BNET has posted it's top 10 worst ads of 2009. This year's selections range from a cheating Mrs. Claus to a cell phone customer gabbing about her STD.

My personal fave is #10 - the furniture store that offers goods for both black and white people! Glad to see that race relations are at an all time high in North Carolina!

CLICK HERE to check them out!

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Viral success...but has it built a brand?

Once again, OfficeMax has released the ElfYourself greeting card builder and the social networking sites are flooding with everyone's hilarious creations.

ElfYourself is a simple, yet brilliant tool that lets you upload the faces of up to five friends into an interface. The photos become the faces of a bunch of elves. It then spits out a "greeting card" where your elves dance around the screen to a disco version of a holiday song - complete with disco dance floor, funky moves and camera angles. The ElfYourself is sure to get a chuckle from anyone who sees it. At the end of the sequence, you are given the opportunity to click and purchase holiday gifts (mugs, shirts, etc.) with your elf's face on i t from Office Max.

The ElfYourself site was launched back in 2006 by OfficeMax and reappears every holiday season with much anticipation and exponential usage - as a recurring "viral" website, it is probably one of, if not the most successful (in my opinion).

After a drop off in popularity last year, the added integration into Facebook and Twitter has caused a resurgence. OfficeMax's agency, Tribal DDB, also organized a flash mob of elves in New York to generate additional hype.

My question of course is - has it helped to build the OfficeMax brand; and more importantly, does it generate sales?

OfficeMax does provide a call to action to buy swag after watching the greeting card. The creator can also purchase a copy of the card for $4.99 to keep beyond the holidays.

I've searched the 'net trying to find out, but a Google search returns articles with lots of stats on views / hits but nothing about sales or monetization.

OfficeMax has hit a homerun with their fun take on the traditional e-card but I am dying to know what it cost them to launch/promote and if it has had any real impact on business... and more importantly, does it really matter in this case? Maybe OfficeMax just wants to spread some holiday cheer!

Friday, November 13, 2009

Interactive Trailers... Stepping it up!

Online trailers for games and movies are nothing new. Apple has owned the movie trailer space for ages. Now YouTube is a major player. Afficionados flock to trailer sites to get whatever sneak peeks they can into upcoming titles. A well produced trailer can generate lots of hype and even go viral, giving the release a significant marketing advantage long-before the release date.

Until recently, the trailer has always been a short clip (usually 3 minutes or less) showing some of the title's best material from action shots to funny moments to scary scenes. The one thing every trailer had in common was that it was just a video.

This all changed last year, when Nintendo put out an interactive trailer for Warioland Shake It. What made this trailer awesome is how the YouTube page started to shake and crumble as Wario did damage in the actual game trailer.

I was recently refered to GameTrailers.com to check out a new trailer for the latest chapter in the Resident Evil series... Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles. The result was far more enticing than anything I could have imagined and something anyone interested in the Interactive space NEEDS to see.

This is the perfect example of what a trailer can be. I can tell you that after seeing the trailer, my excitement level for this game is way higher than it would have been with a normal trailer.

I can't wait to watch as designers battle for the next awesome trailer and look forward to watching the trailer evolve into a truly exciting and interactive marketing tool.

Check out the two trailers here:
Warioland Shake It
Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Funky Bunky

So today's blog is actually more of a plug than it is an actual entry, but there is still a lesson to be learned.

A family member has recently started a new company called Funky Bunky. They are creating custom-made playhouses, dog houses and bunk houses. Since symmetry sucks, the Funky Bunky has a pretty unique design with crooked windows, doors and roof.

My nephews think this is the greatest thing in the world and Fido will definitely get a kick out of his new home as well.

I would encourage anyone with kids, an outdoor dog or a cottage to check this out!

Check out the Funky Bunky promotional video below and please tell your friends!


Friday, October 16, 2009

The Power of Viral

Ever heard of the "Three Wolf Moon" tee? If you're on the Internet, there's a good chance you have.

What is so important about this Internet phenom? Absolutely nothing. But somehow, the shirt, distributed by a New Hampshire-based wholesale company called The Mountain has become the #1 selling apparel item on Amazon.com.

The phenom started when pranksters started creating reviews for the shirt on Amazon which told of the "power" of the shirt.

According to reviewers, who have flocked to the site in droves to create their own stories, the shirt helps men attract women. For example, one reviewer wrote:

"This item has wolves on it which makes it intrinsically sweet and worth 5 stars by itself, but once I tried it on, that's when the magic happened. After checking to ensure that the shirt would properly cover my girth, I walked from my trailer to Wal-mart with the shirt on and was immediately approached by women."

Some of the stories/reviews are absolutely hilarious. Others, just plain stupid. There's even a fully produced video review! Either way, this plain old tee has been reviewed over 1,500 times on Amazon with more appearing daily. The shirt has also hit mainstream after being worn on TV by the likes of Rainn Wilson in The Office.

The Mountain reported a 2300% increase in sales of this one shirt alone and while they don't seem to mind the sales, they're keeping pretty quiet about it stating that they're not huge fans of some of the comments being posted by readers.

Others trying to capitalize on the shirt-sensation have created the "5 kittens" and other not-so-cool knock offs.

The moral of the story: the viral capabilities of the Internet can make just about anything a success. Some clever marketing and a little bit of luck can help make your product a huge phenom.... even if it is just a fad.

For a whole lot of laughs, check out the Three Wolves reviews on Amazon.com by clicking here.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Mr. Sub fires agency over "gay" ad.

Mr. Sub has fired it's ad agency BOS after receiving complaints about a TV ad that "promoted homophobia".

The ad begins with a rather large family sitting around the dinner table. The father then "comes out" to his wife and excessive number of children by claiming to be "super, super gay".

The comlpaint was officially filed by Shannon Devine, a communication director for the CAW, which represents a significant gay, bi, lesbian and transgendered community.

While I have to admit, I'm not normally a big fan of the CAW, I have to agree with them on this one. There's a fine line between funny and offensive and Mr. Sub really crossed the line with this ad.

Their message is: "not everyone likes surprises" with the intent of showing that you always know what to expect at Mr. Sub. The complain from the CAW claims that the ad belittles the incredibly difficult process of "coming out".

Frankly, it is completely beyond me how this is supposed to sell a sandwich. As long as I can remember, Mr. Sub has always attempted a little bit of humour in their advertising. This time it went too far.

I'm all for building an edgy ad - even one with a hint of controversy to stir up some conversation - but there are certain topics you just don't mess with.



Does this ad offend you?

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Bullshit baffles brains?


I recently did some work with a gentleman who was looking to promote a branded social marketing solution to Tier-1 companies and agencies.

Working in close quarters, I often listened in on his cold calling. Conveniently, he claimed to have worked extensively in the category of everyone he called hoping to gain some credibility. I'm confident that he has not worked extensively, if at all, in most of the categories he claimed to.

He believed that this "strategy" would lead prospects to believe that he was knowledgeable in their category and would therefore been seen as a strategic partner rather than just another sales pitch. When I asked him about this, his response was "bullshit baffles brains".

I found this to be pretty ironic given that one of the fundamental principles for companies playing in the social space is to engage in OPEN and HONEST dialog with consumers.

Why, I asked myself, would someone lie in an attempt to sell an honest form of communication?

I truly believe that honesty is the best policy when it comes to sales and business in general. Bullshit may baffle brains at some point, but people are seldom fooled more than once and the marketing world is pretty small and it doesn't take much to tarnish your name. Lying to get a sale may work once, but it seldom works as a long-term strategy.

I've since parted ways with this person due to conflicting personalities but I am interested to see if he gets anywhere with his program...

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

GM takes responsibility


Genral Motors recently announced a new program to offer customers a full refund if they are not satisifed with their vehicle. The program applies to all Chevrolet, GMC, Buick and Cadillac vehicles purchased between September 14 and November 30.

Customers may return the vehicle for full refund if not satisfied between 31 and 60 days of purchase.

The program is part of an ad campaign titled "May the best car win"

This is the first time in the history of the auto industry that an auto maker has actually taken some real accountability for their products. Every other retailer offers some form of refund program, but with cars, the customer basically gets a test drive and then has to decide if they are going to commit to a pretty significant purchase.

Sure, returning a $200 camera is very different from returning a $30,000 vehicle, but I would still love to see the rest of the auto industry create similar and ongoing programs.

I would like to think that most people won't bother returning a car, but what about the occasional "lemon"? Auto-makers typically do everything they can to repair a faulty vehicle, which instantly upsets the customer.

The chances of this becoming a mainstream practice in the auto industry are very slim, but I do give kudos to GM for taking yet another strong step towards winning back consumer confidence.

I'm very interested to see if this campaign does anything to help boost sales.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Samsung watches you watching its ad!


Samsung has just announced a new outdoor digital advertising technology that uses a camera and proprietary facial recognition software to determine who is watching the ads and use that data to target ads displayed.

The platform is based on an LCD screen, which displays digital ads. A camera mounted above the screen can analyze the number of people watching the ad, their gender, their age group (child or adult) and how long they watched the ad.

If the data shows that the screen location mainly reaches male adults, they can display ads that are more relevant to that demographic.

While the concept is interesting, I have to wonder how accurate it is. I'm also curious as to how people will respond to this type of advertising from a privacy standpoint.

Personally, this is less offensive to me than having someone like Google track my websurfing habits and advertising to me based on them, but I'm also not keen on having Samsung's cameras capture my face every time I pass one of their ad screens.

I suppose from a marketing standpoint there is some good value in this, but we'll have to wait until their global launch this November to find out what people really think.

You can read more at PC World.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Bud sues Brick over "Lime"

The "King of Beers" has been making a lot of headlines lately. First they scored some media with their response to Coors Light's "cold" billboard, now they're at it again by suing the Brick Brewing Company over the launch of their Red Baron Lime product.

According to the article at Bloomberg.com, the issue is with Red Baron's green label and the use of limes. The beer giant claims that: "Brick’s label will lead people to believe its Red Baron beer is associated with, authorized by or in some way connected with Anheuser". A-B is seeking an undisclosed sum in addition to $500,000 in punitive damages.

Bud Light Lime has been incredibly successful both from an awareness campaign and from Canadian sales. It's no wonder others are trying to cash in on the popular flavour. Even still, flavoured beers - particularly lime - are not new. Mexican beers have been served with a lime wedge since the dawn of time. The ol' "Lime n Lager" has been favoured by many as a refreshing twist on a straight beer.

Some thoughts on this fiasco:

- Bud Light Lime was developed partly with the intention of stealing share from expensive imports like Corona. Red Baron, a value-brand priced around 25% lower than Bud Light Lime, is looking to steal share from the global giant. A-B takes offense to this.

- A-B is suing a tiny brewery with limited capacity and distribution for half a million + the undisclosed amount. How much Red Baron Lime do you think they're actually going to sell?

- This is a classic case of David vs. Goliath that, if anything, will probably help generate sales for Red Baron. Really A-B... choose your battles.

- What's more is that Brick recently settled another lawsuit with Labatt (part of the In-Bev A-B family) over packaging similarities between the Red Baron brand and Labatt's value brand, Brava, which is brewed by the recently acquired Lakeport Breweries.

All this aside, I really hope the courts vote in favour of Brick. This law-suit appears to be a scare tactic more than anything legit and I'm glad Brick has decided to stand their ground this time around. I'm all for defending your IP, trademarks, etc. against legitimate threats or theft, but come on....

...do you really think anyone would be confused by these two packages?

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Coors Light "Colder Than" Billboard Gets Cool Reception


Yesterday, the Toronto Star ran an article about a Coors Light billboard campaign in BC that played on the friendly battle between Torontonians and West Coasters. Following the "Colder Than" slogans, the billboard featured a frosty can of Coors Light and read:

"Colder than most people from Toronto"

These slogans aren't new and are usually pretty clever. There is also a social campaign where consumers can create their own Coors Light "colder than" slogan for a chance to win prizes.

The catch phrase was meant to be humorous and poke fun at Toronto, which is often labeled the most hated city throughout the rest of Canada. The resentment between the East and the West isn't new and is generally harmless. In fact, it's no different than the age old Canadian tradition of poking fun at our American neighbours (or Aussies vs. Kiwis. Or the Irish vs. the English... you catch my drift).

Yet for some odd reason, this ad generated such an outrage by the sensitive people of Hogtown that Coors decided to pull the billboards and replace them with more generic "Colder Than" slogans.

When it comes to advertising you can play it safe and put out another boring ad that might engage the audience, or you can take a chance and try to be a little edgy. The further off-centre you go, the more people will react to (and remember) your ad. Sure, there's a line that shouldn't be crossed, but in today's supposedly politically correct world, that line seems to be getting shorter.


This ad, which I thought was absolutely brilliant was designed in Toronto by Coors Light's agency DraftFCB. That's right - it was a group of Torontonians who thought up this slogan. While the campaign was only run in BC, it managed to not only get all kinds of press nation-wide, but it also generated 32 PAGES of comments from Toronto Star readers across the country.

Was it edgy? Yes.
Did it capture people's attention? Yes.
Did it cross the line and come across as blatantly offensive? I really don't think so.

I'll leave you with a couple of thoughts:

1) A localized billboard campaign got people are talking about the ad and the brand (good or bad) and scored national coverage.

2) If you were offended by this ad, you really need to lighten up. Honestly... are you REALLY that upset? I suspect that if an ad was run in Toronto poking fun at BC Hippies or Newfies, we'd get a chuckle out of it at their expense.

3) I'm willing to bet that Coors Light sales will jump - not suffer as a result of this ad. Mainly because the people crying bloody murder don't fit into their target demographic anyway.

4) If you haven't already, PLEASE watch the brilliant documentary: Let's All Hate Toronto!

Kudos to DraftFCB for a fun and engaging ad campaign. I'll raise a Cold Certified silver bullet to your team.

I hope to see a billboard over the DVP that reads:

Coors Light: Colder than a Torontonian offended by a billboard about Torontonians

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Sampling... does it work?


This post is actually a response to an experience that I had last night at the Rogers Cup with my good friend and fellow marketer Adam...

Sampling is arguably one of the best ways to induce trial of your product. More often than not, people don't know what they're missing if they haven't experienced something new.

There are really only two possible outcomes that can come from sampling:

1) Consumer tries product. Consumer likes product. Consumer continues to buy product.

2) Consumer grabs as much "free stuff" as possible. Consumer tries free stuff. Consumer habits don't change.

Having executed all kinds of sampling in the beer, wine and spirits industry, I can tell you that in order to significantly increase your chance at converting a consumer, there needs to be some kind of experience tied in with the sampling.

Anyone can hand something out free on the street, but if you offer something - anything - that might capture the consumer's attention or leave a lasting impression, there is a significantly higher chance of triggering a response in that consumer that builds enough brand loyalty to hook them.

Let's look at a couple of examples:

Last week I was driving through Yorkville to get to a meeting. At the corner of Yonge and Bloor, I saw a woman holding a bag and handing out samples of (what looked like) laundry detergent. She was not branded. She did not really engage anyone. She simply walked up to people on the sidewalk and handed them a small package if they would take it.

I could write a long spiel about all the things wrong with this, but it seems painfully obvious.

Now let's talk about our experience from last night:

Adam and I are at the Rexall Centre for the Rogers Cup. Prior to the main match, we sit down in the beer garden for a couple of Coronas. A menu board listing the available beverages calls out "Pimm's No 1 Cup" and refers to it as a Tennis Tradition.

I've heard of Pimm's but have never tried it. I'm also not a tennis guy, so thinking that the Pimm's "tradition" might be akin to sipping a mint julep at the Kentucky Derby, I ask the bartender what the drink is all about.

She explains that while she hasn't tried it, it's a cocktail made with Pimm's, lemon-lime soda, fresh mint and cucmber. She then asks if we want to sample a mini version.

Long story short, we enjoyed the cocktail and despite the premium price ($6.85 for a Pimm's cocktail vs. $5.35 for a Corona) we stuck with them the rest of the night. It was so enjoyable that we'll be buying 2 bottles of Pimm's to make these for our friends at the cottage this coming weekend.

Why did this sample convert me? You could argue that I'm a lush... and you would be right. But let's consider the facts.

1) Place - a professional tennis match will probably attract a good chunk of people that enjoy a complex cocktail. A UFC match... not so much.

2) Experience - intentional or not, I got sucked in by the whole "tennis tradition" bit. If this cocktail has a history of being part of tennis, I want to maximize my experience. It's the same as grabbing a beer and a dog at a baseball game.

3) Engagement - the bartender was not there to sample Pimm's. She was not a brand ambassador and admitted to never having tried the drink. But she knew what was in it and the brief conversation we had around the drink engaged me to the point where I became curious.

It doesn't take much to turn a sampling program into an experience. A little thought around where you're sampling, who you're sampling to and how you're going to sample can make all the difference in the world.

Monday, August 10, 2009

Honesty is the ONLY policy

One of the key elements in social marketing is encouraging open and honest conversation with consumers. Any attempts to secretly fool them or control a message will cause a great deal of harm. Marketers need to understand that consumers who get involved in social media are talkers. Try to pull a fast one on them and they'll be spreading the word like wild-fire, which can ultimately leave you in a worse situation than where you started.

Let's talk about Nissan and their Hypercube contest, developed by Cap C.

The idea behind this campaign was to leverage social media to create buzz around the new Nissan Cube by hosting an online contest that asked participants to use various social media outlets to show their creativity for a chance to win one of 50 Cubes.

You have to hand it to both Nissan and Cap C - they took a huge leap of faith creating this type of campaign when the auto industry was at an all time low and social media still remains a relatively new and misunderstood marketing space.

On the other hand, some scandal in the judging practices landed them in hot water with several contestants who believed the contest was rigged, which ultimately lead to some negative buzz.

Without wanting to go into all the detail, I will say that in my opinion, neither Nissan nor Cap C intended any foul play and have taken reasonable steps to reach out to disenchanted participants.

That said, this is a good lesson in the potential dangers of social media. ALWAYS be honest with consumers. If they're saying something you don't like, the best thing to do is engage them and find out why they're upset and try to fix it. If you brush it off or ignore it, your efforts will backfire on you.

You can read more about the aftermath of this campaign by checking out this article in Marketing mag.